Cargotec-Konecranes deal highlights EU-UK regulatory differences; and CADE’s penalty reckoning
08 April 2022 00:00
Duration: 23:02
The collapse of a deal involving two Finnish crane companies — Cargotec and Konecranes — as a result of regulatory obstacles has thrust into the spotlight differences in outlook between the UK and the European Union on mergers and acquisitions. The European Commission had been prepared to wave the deal through — albeit with undertakings from the companies to divest an array of assets; but the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority concluded that the undertakings on the table wouldn’t be enough to allay its fears of competitive harm. The deal highlighted and solidify the differences between those regulators that are prepared to work with undertakings; and those who aren’t. Also on the podcast today: Brazil’s CADE faces scrutiny over antitrust penalties.
Related Content
-
uliana Domingues has been appointed the national competition authority's attorney general
-
UK competition regulator’s block of Cargotec’s merger with Konecranes has set the tone for future split from the EC
Editorial Team
James Panichi Senior Editor, Asia Pacific
James, an Australian journalist with over 25 years’ experience in print and electronic media, helps to oversee MLex’s coverage of regulatory risk in Asia, with special attention to Australia and New Zealand. In 2016, James was appointed as MLex’s managing editor for continental Europe, overseeing the Brussels bureau’s coverage of EU regulatory affairs and managing a team of 16 journalists in Brussels and Geneva. Previously James worked for the European Voice newspaper, before joining the... Read more