Some items on our site have recently moved. Visit our News Hub for selected articles, special reports, podcasts and other resources.
Tech platform publishing immunity should be re-evaluated, Chopra says
28 Mar 2019 12:00 am by Max Fillion
Antitrust regulators need to reconsider which tech companies are immune from any liability related to the content they publish, US Federal Trade Commission member Rohit Chopra said today. Tech companies’ convergence with digital advertising has pushed them outside the protection of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the Democrat said.
“In applying Section 230, I think we should consider whether immunity is conferred only to the companies that are mere conduits of communication,” Chopra told a Washington conference* audience. “A company engaged in or benefitting from behavioral advertising is not acting necessarily as that passive conduit.”
When tech companies package their users’ data into detailed demographics, they are in effect creating content, Chopra said. This kind of behavior increased as tech companies purchased advertisers, Chopra said, giving Google’s purchase of DoubleClick as an example.
“Behavioral advertising technology has altered the relationship between platform user and content by monetizing user activity and information.” Chopra said. “So, far from being a neutral or passive conduit, these platforms are now actively shaping and profiting from user communications.”
*American Bar Association Antitrust Section Spring Meeting 2019. Washington, DC. March 27-29, 2019.
07 Jun 2021 12:00 am by Claude MarxCongressional Democrats are speeding up their efforts to ensure the FTC is given statutory power to recover ill-gotten gains.
Google set to rein in apps' access to data, even as it faces regulatory pressure over location-data collection04 Jun 2021 12:32 am by Mike SwiftGoogle told app developers that by late 2021, a unique device-identifying code that Android apps use to target ads to individuals will be off-limits if a user opts out of personalized advertising.
That a jury would require no more than half a day to deliberate at the end of an 11-week trial was a bad omen for Australia’s federal prosecutors.