Some items on our site have recently moved. Visit our News Hub for selected articles, special reports, podcasts and other resources.
DOJ's effort to streamline merger review so far successful, senior DOJ official says
27 March 2019 00:00 by Flavia Fortes
Since a recent change in policy by the US Department of Justice to streamline merger reviews, all new investigations are on track for closing within six months, a senior DOJ official said.
“There have been more than 30 [Hart-Scott-Rodino Act notifications] filed that resulted in division investigations,” Barry Nigro, deputy assistant attorney general at DOJ, said at a conference* in Washington. “I would say that all of them are either completed or on track to be resolved within 6 months.”
Nigro said that with respect to some of the limits on custodians in depositions, the agency has adhered to those limits in all but 3 matters.
The DOJ has not exceeded the deposition limit in any matter, he said.
“So far things are going well. It’s early in the process; we’re only six months in. We will work hard on our end to achieve those limits in as many matters we can,” Nigro said.
DOJ announced last September an overhaul of its merger procedures to streamline the agency’s review process.
Changes to the merger procedures include a new policy to encourage initial, introductory meetings with the parties and a reformed timing agreement designed to limit both the number of depositions and the number of custodians of confidential company information involved.
* American Bar Association Antitrust Section Spring Meeting 2019. Washington DC. March 27-29, 2019.
03 October 2022 00:00 by Claude MarxThe House passed a bill that combined three measures which advocates of stronger enforcement
26 September 2022 16:15 by Simon ZekariaDigital economy presents new scenarios for competition policy for which regulators and courts need "novel" and "creative" approaches
23 September 2022 10:34 by Simon ZekariaUK collective action regime that pursues damages for businesses and consumers over alleged competition-law infringements