Antitrust Antitrust

Comment: Dominance abusers see EU regulator refresh its approach and bin burdensome guidance

Big antitrust cases against big companies have become a big headache for the European Commission in recent years.
The increased sophistication of companies, lawyers and economists has persuaded judges to tear holes in some of the EU regulator’s most eye-catching cases, meaning enforcers grew hesitant, cases took longer, and new

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to MLex or register for a free trial.

Lewis Crofts

Editor-In-Chief


Lewis leads MLex's editorial strategy, content direction, quality and development. He has a reputation for breaking stories and providing analysis on complex legal disputes before regulators and courts around the globe. He has also developed MLex's unrivalled coverage of competition policy, litigation, regulation, Brexit and international investigations.

Nicholas Hirst

Chief Correspondent


Nicholas covers EU merger review and antitrust investigations for Mlex in Brussels. He previously wrote about EU affairs for Politico Europe, European Voice and PaRR. After earning an LLM in European law from the College of Europe in Bruges, he spent a year working in the competition practice of a leading competition law firm in Brussels 2009-10. He graduated in modern European languages from Oxford University in 2006.

Discover MLex

Stay on top of global regulatory developments

Latest News