Antitrust Antitrust

Non-compete clauses in Nevada anesthesiology case ‘unreasonable’ even under rule-of-reason standard, US DOJ says

By Khushita Vasant
  • 25 Feb 2022 23:49
  • 26 Feb 2022 01:16
Non-compete agreements are "unreasonable" and raise "significant concerns," even under a rule-of-reason standard, the US Department of Justice said today in a statement-of-interest filed in a Nevada state court as part of a private lawsuit involving employment in the market for anesthesiologists.
Plaintiffs' allegations in the lawsuit, which was filed

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in to MLex or register for a free trial.

Khushita Vasant

Chief Antitrust Correspondent, US


Khushita covers US antitrust enforcement and litigation for MLex. A former Brussels hand, she wrote about about antitrust & mergers for the Policy and Regulatory Report (PaRR), she has covered the EU's actions against Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon to name a few. Khushita specialises in tech and patent policy coverage which featured in the Concurrences Antitrust Writing Awards. Previously as a financial journalist for The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires, she wrote about monetary policy and the bond and currency markets. Khushita studied journalism at Mumbai University, and received an Erasmus Mundus scholarship for a masters from universities in Germany and Austria.

Discover MLex

Stay on top of global regulatory developments

Latest News