Covid-19 impact not deemed a legitimate factor for SAMR to lower antitrust fines
11 May 2020 12:00 am by Yonnex Li
China's antitrust regulator doesn't consider the economic hardship brought about by the Covid-19 epidemic as a legitimate mitigating factor to reduce fines for confirmed antitrust violations, MLex has learned.
The State Administration for Market Regulation, or SAMR, isn't empowered to factor in the epidemic because it is not among the statutory circumstances stipulated in the Antimonopoy Law where the agency may reduce fines, it is said.
SAMR has maintained the view despite earlier requests from companies under investigation that the regulator consider their financial and operational difficulties during and after the epidemic, even though their conduct was committed before the virus hit.
According to Article 49 of China's antitrust law, when determining the amount of fines for antitrust violations, the authority should consider "such factors as the nature, extent and duration of the violations."
Article 46 stipulates that if a party to an anticompetitive agreement manages to self-report the offence and provides material evidence, the authority may exempt the company from punishment, or mitigate the sanctions.
The epidemic doesn't appear to fit into the categories under which SAMR may reduce an offender's legal liabilities, MLex was told.
Covid-19 has taken a toll on Chinese businesses in the first quarter, as local governments implemented citywide lockdowns to stop the spread of the virus. Life in China, however, has gradually returned to normal following months of social and economic disruptions.
In April, SAMR made it clear that it will exempt cooperation agreements between operators involved in epidemic control and resumption of production, such as those beneficial to technological progress, improvements in efficiency, and the pursuit of public and consumer interests.
The pledges are based on Article 15 of the Antimonopoly Law, which specifies a list of situations where competition rules prohibiting anti competitive agreements will not apply. This brings the Chinese regulator in line with some of its foreign counterparts in giving explicit authorization for companies that should otherwise compete.
20 Oct 2020 10:45 pm by Mike SwiftGoogle pushed back on the US Department of Justice’s claim that it used a network of exclusivity agreements to illegally extend the company's monopoly on search and digital advertising.
20 Oct 2020 10:10 pm by Khushita VasantA complaint against Google filed today by the US Department of Justice is the spitting image of EU findings from 2018 into Android.
29 Sep 2020 6:17 pm by Michael ActonRarely has an antitrust suit generated as much public hype as Epic’s move to take on Apple.