Third Circuit seeks more from plaintiffs in price-fixing class actions

By Leah Nylen. Published 3 October 2017.

In Brief

Four years ago, a Maryland federal judge found enough evidence that manufacturers including DuPont, Huntsman and Kronos conspired to fix prices on the paint pigment titanium dioxide that a class action could go to trial. This month, an appeals court unsealed a Sept. 14 ruling holding 2-1 that paint and coatings maker Valspar couldn't pursue its own case against the titanium dioxide manufacturers, using the exact same evidence. In throwing out Valspar's case, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit appears to have set a higher standard for plaintiffs in antitrust cases where there is only indirect evidence of price-fixing.

Like to read more? Request a free trial.

MLex takes your privacy seriously and we will only use your personal information to provide you with relevant material. By submitting your details you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions, our Privacy Policy and our Cookie Policy. We will not share your personal information with any 3rd parties.

However, as we believe that you may also have an interest in receiving information about similar products and services in the future we may from time to time contact you about related products. You can choose not to be contacted and manage your communications from MLex in our Preference Center

You can also phone us on:

UK (Toll Free) +44 800 999 3237
US (Toll Free) +1 800 356 6547
Hong Kong +852 2965 1424